The alleged chemical weapons use in Syria is a provocation carried out by the rebels to attract a foreign-led strike, Russian President Vladimir Putin said at the G20 summit.
There was no 50/50 split of opinion on the notion of a military strike against the Syrian President Bashar Assad, Mr. Putin stressed refuting earlier assumptions.
Only Turkey, Canada, Saudi Arabia and France joined the U.S. push for intervention, he said, adding that the UK Prime Minister’s position was not supported by his citizens.
Russia, China, India, Indonesia, Argentina, Brazil, South Africa and Italy were among the major world’s economies clearly opposed to military intervention.
President Putin said the G20 nations spent the “entire” Thursday evening Sept. 5 discussing the Syrian crisis, which was followed by Mr. Putin’s bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister David Cameron that lasted till 3 a.m. Moscow time.
Russia “will help Syria” in the event of a military strike, Mr. Putin stressed as he responded to a reporter’s question at the summit.
“Will we help Syria? We will. And we are already helping, we send arms, we cooperate in the economics sphere, we hope to expand our cooperation in the humanitarian sphere, which includes sending humanitarian aid to support those people–the civilians–who have found themselves in a very dire situation in this country,” Mr. Putin said.
Mr. Putin said he sat down with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the G20 summit and talked for about half an hour in “a friendly atmosphere.”
Although the Russian and the American leaders maintained different positions regarding the Syrian issue, Mr. Putin said they “hear” and understand each other.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry will continue discussing the situation in Syria “in the short run,” Mr. Putin said.
Meanwhile, President Obama reiterated in his summit speech that the U.S. government believes Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces were behind the chemical weapons use.
Mr. Obama pledged to make a good case on the issue for both the international community and the American people, saying many nations are already “comfortable” with the U.S. opinion.
While admitting “a number of countries” at the summit stressed any military action plan should go through the UN Security Council, Mr. Obama said the U.S. is in a different “camp” that questioned the UNSC effectiveness.
“Given the Security Council’s paralysis on this issue, if we are serious about upholding a ban on chemical weapons use, then an international response is required and that will not come through the Security Council action,” Mr. Obama said.
‘A dangerous precedent’
Both presidents stressed that the situation in Syria could create a dangerous precedent, but supported their points with contrasting arguments.
Mr. Obama stressed his “goal” and U.S. “responsibility” was to maintain international norms on banning chemical weapon use, saying he wanted the enforcement to be “real.”
“When there is a breach this brazen of a norm this important, and the international community is paralyzed and frozen and doesn’t act, then that norm begins to unravel. And if that norm unravels, then other norms and prohibitions start unraveling, and that makes for a more dangerous world,” Mr. Obama said.
Mr. Putin, on the contrary, stressed that setting precedents of military action outside a UN Security Council resolution would mean the world’s smaller countries can no longer feel safe against the interests of the more powerful ones.
“Small countries in the modern world feel increasingly vulnerable and insecure. One starts getting the impression that a more powerful country can at any time and at its own discretion use force against them,” Mr. Putin said, citing the earlier statement made by the South African president.
Such practice would also make it much harder to convince North Korea to give up its nuclear program, Mr. Putin pointed out.
The meeting of the leaders of the major world economies–G20 —took place in St. Petersburgh, Russia. The participants of the summit focused on economic issues during roundtable talks, including unemployment, the lack of global investment, and better international financial regulation. While on the sidelines the conversation shifted to the issue of the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria and the possibility of military action in the war-torn country. (RT.com)